Full Case Study
Revenue Infrastructure Realignment in a Sponsor-Backed ABA Platform
Execution governance, vendor transition, and revenue infrastructure design during multi-state platform expansion.
Platform Profile
Ownership
Private equity–backed healthcare platform
Geographic Footprint
Operating in 11 states
Estimated Scale
Approximately $500M revenue
Subsector
Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA)
Context
A private equity-backed, multi-state Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) platform was pursuing an active acquisition strategy while preparing for continued growth under sponsor ownership.
Leadership initiated a review of the organization’s revenue cycle infrastructure after identifying signs of revenue underperformance and limited transparency into revenue operations.
The existing revenue cycle function was largely managed through an outsourced RCM vendor, with portions of the operational workflow supported offshore.
However, leadership lacked reliable visibility into performance across the revenue cycle and began to observe increasing gaps between operational RCM reporting and financial reporting.
The sponsor and executive team sought to determine whether:
- the existing RCM vendor was delivering appropriate performance
- alternative vendors could provide improved service at lower cost
- revenue cycle reporting and operational visibility could be strengthened
The organization engaged JHD Healthcare Partners to evaluate the RCM function and lead the transition to a more disciplined and scalable revenue infrastructure.
The Challenge
Operational diagnostics revealed several structural gaps within the organization’s revenue cycle infrastructure.
RCM Performance Underperformance
The existing vendor model was not consistently delivering expected revenue cycle results, contributing to revenue leakage and performance variability.
Limited Reporting Visibility
Revenue cycle reporting lacked standardized dashboards and performance metrics, limiting leadership’s ability to evaluate revenue performance across locations.
Data Misalignment
Revenue cycle reporting did not consistently reconcile with financial reporting, creating uncertainty regarding actual revenue performance and margin realization.
Front-End Revenue Cycle Issues
Charge capture, authorization management, and verification of benefits (VOB) issues created upstream problems that impacted downstream collections performance.
Lack of Standardized Infrastructure
Policies, procedures, and reporting structures were incomplete or inconsistently applied across the organization, making it difficult to scale revenue operations as the platform expanded.
Leadership recognized that resolving these issues required both vendor transition and operational infrastructure redesign.
JHD Intervention
JHD Healthcare Partners was engaged to lead both vendor evaluation and implementation of a new revenue infrastructure model.
The engagement lasted 14 months and reported directly to the CEO and Vice President of Revenue Cycle.
JHD was given full authority to manage the vendor evaluation and oversee implementation of the selected solution.
The engagement included five coordinated workstreams.
Workstream 1: Revenue Cycle Vendor Evaluation
JHD led a structured RFP process to evaluate offshore RCM vendors capable of supporting the platform’s growth and performance objectives.
The process included:
- vendor market evaluation
- RFP design and administration
- operational capability assessment
- financial comparison of vendor options
- leadership decision support
Workstream 2: Revenue Cycle Performance Assessment
JHD conducted a detailed evaluation of the existing revenue cycle function to identify operational gaps and improvement opportunities.
The assessment included:
- collections performance analysis
- denial pattern review
- front-end revenue cycle evaluation
- vendor service performance review
- reporting capability assessment
Workstream 3: Revenue Infrastructure Development
In preparation for transitioning to a new offshore RCM partner, JHD led the development of standardized revenue cycle infrastructure.
This included:
- development of revenue cycle policies and procedures
- documentation of workflows across the revenue lifecycle
- definition of operational roles and performance metrics
Workstream 4: Reporting and Dashboard Development
JHD worked with leadership to design and implement improved revenue performance reporting.
This included:
- development of standardized performance dashboards
- improved transparency into collections and denial trends
- alignment between operational RCM reporting and financial reporting
Workstream 5: Implementation Governance
JHD established and led a structured Project Management Office (PMO) responsible for coordinating the transition to the new RCM partner and implementing the new revenue infrastructure.
The PMO managed:
- vendor transition planning
- cross-functional implementation coordination
- milestone tracking and execution governance
- executive reporting to leadership
Add a closing sentence:
The objective was not simply vendor replacement, but the creation of a disciplined revenue infrastructure capable of supporting platform growth.
Execution Context
This engagement required coordinated execution across revenue cycle operations, finance, vendor management, and executive leadership.
JHD Healthcare Partners operated as an extension of the leadership team, providing both execution capacity and structured governance to ensure alignment across the vendor transition and infrastructure buildout.
The work involved:
- managing a complex offshore vendor transition
- aligning operational and financial reporting structures
- standardizing workflows across a multi-state platform
- supporting leadership decision-making throughout implementation
Results
4% Cost Reduction
Transitioning to the new RCM partner reduced revenue cycle operating costs.
$6M Annual Impact
Combined operational improvements and vendor transition initiatives generated approximately $6 million in projected annual improvement.
Improved Reporting Visibility
Leadership dashboards provided improved transparency into revenue cycle performance across the organization.
Infrastructure Standardization
New policies, procedures, and reporting frameworks created a more consistent revenue operating model across locations.
Strategic Implication
In sponsor-backed healthcare platforms, revenue cycle infrastructure often evolves reactively as organizations scale.
As acquisition velocity increases, operational complexity frequently outpaces the maturity of revenue infrastructure. Without disciplined operational governance, platforms can experience revenue leakage, reporting fragmentation, and margin variability.
Structured execution governance during vendor transitions allows sponsors and operating partners to strengthen infrastructure while maintaining strategic focus.
Deploying this type of governance can:
- stabilize revenue performance
- strengthen financial reporting visibility
- reduce margin volatility
- accelerate integration of acquired practices
- reinforce exit readiness
Infrastructure discipline is not simply an operational improvement.
It is a foundational capability for scaling healthcare platforms.
Evaluating Revenue Infrastructure Across a Platform?
JHD Healthcare Partners works alongside sponsor operating teams to evaluate and stabilize revenue infrastructure across multi-site healthcare platforms.